Ny studie antyder global oppvarming er bare et storbyproblem !

Hentet: https://klimarealistene.com/ny-studie-antyder-global-oppvarming-er-bare-et-storbyproblem/

Ny studie antyder global oppvarming er bare et storbyproblem

En ny studie publisert i det vitenskapelige fagfellevurderte tidsskriftet, Climate, av 37 forskere fra 18 land antyder at nåværende estimater for global oppvarming er forurenset av for sterke utslag av urbane varmeøyer. Den reelle oppvarmingen i moderne tid kan være opptil 40 % lavere enn påstått.

Studien antyder også at anslått solaktivitet benyttet i de siste rapportene fra FNs Klimapanel (IPCC) trolig har undervurdert solens rolle i global oppvarming siden 1800-tallet. Som kjent fra en tidligere studie fra 2021 har IPCC brukt svært tvilsomme datasett når de har nedvurdert solens rolle. Man legger umiddelbart merke til at mange kjente navn står bak denne studien, i tillegg til den svært meritterte Syun-Ichi Akasofu.

Den samme forskergruppen har i en annen studie som konkluderer likt, sett på samme problemstilling ved å analysere tre ulike temperaturestimater og hele 25 ulike estimater over solaktivitet.

Urbane varmeøyer

Det er velkjent at byer er varmere enn det omkringliggende landskapet. Mens urbane områder bare utgjør mindre enn 4 % av klodens landareal, er mange av værstasjonene som brukes til å beregne global temperatur, lokalisert i urbane områder. Derfor har noen forskere vært bekymret for at nåværende estimat for global oppvarming kan ha blitt forurenset av urbane varmeøyeffekter. Med andre ord, høykvalitets temperaturmålinger fra landlige strøk er blandet med lavkvalitetsmålinger fra storbyer, og dermed får vi mindre seriøe og alt for høye gjetninger for global oppvarming. I siste hovedrapport anslo IPCC at byoppvarming sto for mindre enn 10 % av global oppvarming. Imidlertid antyder denne nye studien at byoppvarming kan utgjøre opptil 40 % av oppvarmingen siden 1850.

Disse 40 % kommer i tillegg til de 17 % som IPCC har plusset på observert oppvarming på grunn av en jukstering som på fagspråket betegnes som demaskering. IPCC mener at siden modellert oppvarming er mye større enn observert oppvarming via termometre, så må det være en oppvarming et sted som termometrene ikke har fanget opp, dermed legges det til 17 %. De endrer altså på observasjonene for å få de til å passe til CO2-hypotesen som har feilet. I vitenskapen er ikke dette tillatt, men i klimapolitikken har de sine egne regler.

Hvordan påvirker vår sol?

Den samme forskergruppen, men med færre deltagere, tok dette forholdet opp tidligere. Mens IPCC har brukt en ny modell for solinnstråling (se øverste panel) står solforskningen samlet bak sin egen modell for solinnstråling (se nederste panel i figuren). I tillegg er det avdekket mer snusk, i og med at det er dokumentert at IPCC-modellen (PMOD) ikke følger vitenskapelig metode, imotsetning til ACRIM som brukes av solforkningen. De best orienterte forstår at når man i akademisk sakprosa skriver «ikke følger vitenskapelig metode», så er det i dette tilfellet snakk om metoder som har mest til felles med bedrageri.

Øverste panel viser ifølge IPCC at vår sol ikke har påvirket global temperatur siden 1850, derfor må alt være vår skyld. Nederste panel viser at vår sol er den dominerende klimadriveren.

Studien analyserer svært grundig de to viktigste forholdene, først hvor stor andel av oppvarmingen siden 1850 som skyldes urbane varmeøyer, og så hvilket datasett for solinnstråling som er det mest troverdige mht solens bidrag til trenden i observert temperatur. Dette er en pågående vitenskapelig debatt.

IPCC har i AR6 konkludert med at «contemporary climate change is «overwhelmingly due to human influence» (Technical Summary, p. 11).» Denne studien påpeker at denne konklusjonen er grunnløs, fordi den ikke redegjør forsvarlig for de to pågående vitenskapelige debattene vist til i avsnittet ovenfor.

Studien lener seg på 188 vitenskapelige referanser, og den anbefaler videre forskning på disse forholdene:

  • Bedre kvantifisering av urbane varmeøyers betydning for globale temperatur estimater.
  • Bedre temperatur homogeniserings teknikk for å korrigere for andre forhold.
  • Fastslå hvilket TSI datasett som er mest pålitelig.
  • Vurdering av muligheten for at menneskets påvirkning av nylige klimaendringer er for høyt.
  • Naturlige klimadrivere utenom TSI og vulkansk aktivitet.

Redaksjonen antar at IPCC-leiren vil ignorerer denne forskningen på samme vis som de har ignorert nesten all annen klimaforskning (ca 300 studier årlig) som viser at IPCC tar feil.

Til denne studien har forskerne bare fått svar i form av aktiv trolling fra Gavin Schmidt på bloggen Real Climate.org. Dr. Soon har lovt redaksjonen at vi får forskernes tilsvar til trollingen, slik at vi kan dele dette med leserne. Her er det.

35 thoughts on “Ny studie antyder global oppvarming er bare et storbyproblem !

  1. The very core of your writing whilst appearing reasonable in the beginning, did not sit well with me after some time. Somewhere within the paragraphs you actually managed to make me a believer but just for a short while. I nevertheless have got a problem with your jumps in assumptions and you might do nicely to help fill in those gaps. In the event that you actually can accomplish that, I would definitely end up being fascinated.

  2. I’ve been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this blog. Thank you, I’ll try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your website?

  3. Greetings from Colorado! I’m bored at work so I decided to browse your site on my iphone during lunch break. I really like the info you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m shocked at how fast your blog loaded on my phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, excellent site!

  4. I have been absent for a while, but now I remember why I used to love this website. Thank you, I’ll try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your website?

  5. constantly i used to read saller possts that as
    well clear thesir motive, and thzt iss aloso happening with thios
    popst which I aam reading here.

  6. I have read sso many articcles oon the topic of thee blogger lovvers exdcept tjis paragraph iss iin fact a fastidiious article,
    keep itt up.

  7. Hey! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share. Thank you!

  8. Great write-up, I am normal visitor of one’s web site, maintain up the excellent operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

  9. I have been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or blog posts on this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this site. Studying this information So i am glad to express that I’ve a very excellent uncanny feeling I found out just what I needed. I so much definitely will make sure to don?¦t omit this site and give it a glance on a relentless basis.

  10. I haven¦t checked in here for a while as I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are great quality so I guess I¦ll add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  11. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  12. hey there and thank you for your information – I have definitely picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise several technical issues using this web site, as I experienced to reload the website a lot of times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google and can damage your high quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I am adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for much more of your respective exciting content. Ensure that you update this again very soon..

  13. This design is steller! You definitely know how to keep a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Great job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!

  14. It’s actually a nice and useful piece of information. I’m satisfied that you shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  15. Good blog! I truly love how it is simple on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I could be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your RSS feed which must do the trick! Have a nice day!

  16. You really make it appear really easy together with your presentation but I in finding this matter to be really one thing which I believe I would by no means understand. It seems too complex and extremely wide for me. I’m looking ahead for your subsequent put up, I’ll try to get the grasp of it!

  17. The subsequent time I learn a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I mean, I know it was my option to learn, however I actually thought youd have something attention-grabbing to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you possibly can fix should you werent too busy on the lookout for attention.

  18. Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was curious about your situation; many of us have developed some nice practices and we are looking to exchange solutions with others, why not shoot me an email if interested.

  19. Hmm it seems like your site ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any tips and hints for beginner blog writers? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  20. I must show thanks to you just for rescuing me from this type of difficulty. As a result of exploring throughout the world wide web and seeing principles which were not productive, I assumed my entire life was well over. Existing without the answers to the problems you have solved as a result of your main guideline is a critical case, and those which may have adversely affected my entire career if I had not noticed your website. Your good ability and kindness in maneuvering all areas was invaluable. I am not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t come upon such a step like this. I’m able to at this point look ahead to my future. Thanks for your time very much for the specialized and results-oriented help. I won’t be reluctant to suggest the sites to any person who needs to have guide about this situation.

  21. Thanks for your write-up. Another element is that just being a photographer includes not only difficulties in capturing award-winning photographs but also hardships in establishing the best digicam suited to your requirements and most especially issues in maintaining the quality of your camera. This is very accurate and noticeable for those professional photographers that are into capturing this nature’s fascinating scenes – the mountains, the forests, the wild or maybe the seas. Going to these daring places unquestionably requires a photographic camera that can live up to the wild’s hard surroundings.

  22. you’re really a good webmaster. The website loading speed is amazing. It seems that you’re doing any unique trick. Furthermore, The contents are masterpiece. you have done a great job on this topic!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *